This case study documents how a comprehensive user research study revealed critical cultural differences that prevented a costly international expansion mistake. An Australian gift card company's planned US market entry was fundamentally redesigned after research showed that feature prioritization rankings between Australia and the US were completely inverted.
Bottom Line: A $40,000 research investment saved an estimated $40 million by revealing that the company's successful Australian product model would have failed in the US market due to fundamental cultural differences in gifting behaviors and values.
I was engaged by the executive group (CEO, CTO) of a successful Australian gift card company generating approximately $400 million in revenue annually. Having achieved market saturation within Australia, their strategic plan was to expand into the US market.
The existing plan was straightforward: copy and paste the entire business model—the tech stack, product features, and call centre support—and launch in the US to see how it would perform.
During strategy meetings, I raised a fundamental question: "Does gifting behaviour change across different cultures?" In my view, gifting is an emergent quality specific to each society's social practices and will naturally vary worldwide. The CEO allocated resources for me to validate their expansion strategy by investigating how US consumers' gifting behaviours might differ from Australian patterns.
The key approach was to break down the existing tech stack, product features, functionality, and user flows, then examine how users from different regions would respond to these elements. We included Australia, the US, and the UK in our study—the UK providing an important triangulation point to strengthen our comparative analysis.
Our platform also tested future-state product features planned for the next one to two years—important since the US launch would take approximately two years to implement.
We developed a comprehensive research methodology that merged qualitative and quantitative approaches:
The study successfully recruited 153 participants evenly distributed across Australia, United Kingdom and the United States, with an additional research survey conducted using a previous recruitment company to validate the quality of the new recruitment company (Optimal Workshop).
"The most striking discovery was that product feature prioritisation rankings between Australia and the US were completely inverted"
Australian users strongly valued understanding and empathising with the gift recipient's experience—they wanted to see when a person received their gift, call them afterward, and customise the gift-opening experience. This reflected an empathy-centered approach to gifting where the giver feels good because the recipient feels good.
In contrast, US users prioritised completely different features: donations and gift card contributions to charities. This might be connected to different religious beliefs in the US market, where charitable giving as part of gifting carried greater significance than the unwrapping experience.
Global average prioritisation:
As the data came in, I texted the CEO: "There's some really powerful information here. Let's discuss tomorrow."
After analysing the results and preparing a report, we presented findings that revealed profound insights.
The most striking discovery was that feature prioritisation rankings between Australia and the US were completely inverted.
This research uncovered ethnographic, sociological, and anthropological insights that are almost always missing in the tech industry. We frequently don't understand how beliefs, behaviours, and social practices vary across markets, regions, and countries.
Companies tend to project their own cultural assumptions onto new regions without recognising these crucial differences.
This case demonstrates why validating strategies before significant investment is essential—particularly when expanding internationally.
Using this approach and methodology, as designers we can iterate weekly without any code or product changes, and understand which pathway to take that maximises product success potential.
This research demonstrates that ethnographic, sociological, and anthropological insights are almost always missing in the tech industry. We frequently don't understand how beliefs, behaviours, and social practices vary across markets, regions, and countries.
Companies tend to project their own cultural assumptions onto new regions without recognising these crucial differences. This case demonstrates why validating strategies before significant investment is essential—particularly when expanding internationally.
The $40,000 research investment prevented a potential $40 million mistake by revealing fundamental cultural differences that would have caused the Australian product model to fail in the US market. This case study provides a framework for cultural validation that can prevent costly international expansion errors while enabling more effective, culturally-informed product development strategies.